Resources
Identification of Important Habitats in Coastal New Hampshire
Use of the Analysis for Conservation
Purposes
The analysis has identified specific high value sites within the study
area, and documented habitat utility for key species. Three steps need
to be taken to translate this information into conservation actions: 1)
dissemination of the information; 2) specifying the types of actions to
be taken, and 3) acquisition of funding to carry out the actions. Thus,
this analysis can be used as justification for matching grants to purchase
lands, or justification for regulatory protection or multiple- use management
sensitive to resource needs.
Dissemination of Information
We have assembled and/or produced technical information in the form of
this report and as digital data. These should be made available to governmental,
non-governmental and academic professionals and to knowledgeable lay persons.
More general distribution will require production of a popular version
of the report, translating the information and summarizing it to focus
on the major findings.
We supplied draft maps of environmental themes and habitats, and associated
narratives, to reviewers, showed them to Conservation Commissioners from
coastal towns and to members of the Living Resources Team of the New Hampshire
Estuary Project. All of our environmental and species coverages will be
supplied to New Hampshire's central repository, GRANIT, and to the Jackson
Estuarine Research Laboratory. We anticipate that the GOMC will publish
and distribute the analysis, to make it widely available to conservation
interests.
Specification of Actions
The next step is to relate the habitat information from the analysis
to potential management, regulatory, and land acquisition actions. Each
of these actions can promote conservation most effectively in particular
contexts. For example, management can be used to enhance habitat, but
may be limited where land is subject to other uses; regulation may not
be limited to specific areas, but usually can only maintain the status
quo. Purchase of land or easements can allow exclusive rights to manage
or protect areas, but this method is limited by relatively high cost.
One way to decide on the most effective type of action is to examine the
level of threat to the habitat. Banner and Gormley (1996) noted that existing
regulation protected much of the highest value habitats identified in
Casco Bay, Maine. Most of the lower value habitats at risk from projected
land development could be protected by relatively small increases in regulatory
setbacks. The remaining high value habitats at risk were relatively small
in area, and thus realistic candidates for protection by purchase.
The information in the present report is suitable for further processing
to identify habitats most at risk of destruction or degradation. One way
of examining threats from future development is to conduct a "buildout"
analysis, then overlay the expected development on existing habitats to
see which are affected (Banner and Gormley 1996). The New Hampshire Estuaries
Project proposes to conduct such a buildout analysis to evaluate potential
loss of living resources. Once the threatened habitats are identified,
lead agencies should promulgate a strategy for protection. This may take
the form of outreach for voluntary conservation on private lands, land
purchase by conservation entities or local, state, federal agencies, special
designations (sanctuaries, reserves) for private/public lands and waters,
or modification of management to multiple use of public lands by the current
resource agencies. In some circumstances (where threats are of low level
and/or involve a relatively narrow zone around key habitats) this may
take the form of zoning setbacks, conservation districting or management;
in others (significant unique features, such as bird-nesting islands or
heritage sites) the strategy may be to acquire land or an easement.
Once local interests have this information they will be in a position
to use it for municipal planning and voluntary habitat protection. The
latter may take advantage of a number of funding opportunities for conservation
actions, some of which are listed in Appendix B.
|